TV Shows like Either/Or
If you enjoy Either/Or, you may also like Jeopardy!, Family Feud and Have I Got News for You. These recommendations share similar tone, themes, or genres, making them natural follow-ups once you finish this show, and can be streamed for free.
Jeopardy! • TV Show • Rating 6.9 out of 10
Family Feud • TV Show • Rating 7.5 out of 10
Have I Got News for You • TV Show • Rating 7.2 out of 10
QI • TV Show • Rating 7.9 out of 10
Wheel of Fortune • TV Show • Rating 6.9 out of 10
The Bob Newhart Show • TV Show • Rating 7.5 out of 10
Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? • TV Show • Rating 6.3 out of 10
Comedy Bang! Bang! • TV Show • Rating 6.3 out of 10
Celebrity Juice • TV Show • Rating 6.7 out of 10
8 Out of 10 Cats Does Countdown • TV Show • Rating 7.4 out of 10
The Eric Andre Show • TV Show • Rating 7.9 out of 10
The Ed Sullivan Show • TV Show • Rating 6.8 out of 10
Ant & Dec's Saturday Night Takeaway • TV Show • Rating 6.1 out of 10
This Hour Has 22 Minutes • TV Show • Rating 6.7 out of 10
The Cuphead Show! • TV Show • Rating 7.9 out of 10
Penn & Teller: Fool Us • TV Show • Rating 7.2 out of 10
Whose Line Is It Anyway? • TV Show • Rating 7.9 out of 10
Shooting Stars • TV Show • Rating 7.7 out of 10
The Circle • TV Show • Rating 6.8 out of 10
Da Ali G Show • TV Show • Rating 7.0 out of 10
What is Either/Or about?
Either/Or was a surreal 1999 television comedy game show, which was broadcast on the digital channel UK Play. The show takes its name from the book Either/Or by Søren Kierkegaard. It starred Simon Munnery as his League Against Tedium character and was a precursor to his BBC series Attention Scum!. The show was largely a launchpad for Munnery's unusual comic monologues. In the quiz, a fluctuating number of contestants assembled in a circle. All of the contestants had to wear hoods and long gowns, to cover their identity. Munnery posed bizarre questions to which each contestant had to answer, with a placard, either one way or another. Those who answered 'correctly' to this question were deemed 'winners', and, as such, 'won' the right to remain anonymous. The questions continued until only one person remained, the loser, whose identity was exposed.